Multi-Source Consensus Verification

Don't ask one AI if it's true.
Ask five sources and show the work.

Crosscheck verifies every claim in your content against independent authoritative sources. Not a single LLM guessing. Real consensus from real references, with full transparency on every verdict.

Start verifying free → See plans

Free tier: 3 verifications/month. No card required.

How It Works
From paste to verified in under 2 minutes.
01
📋
Paste or Upload
Drop in your article, press release, or research. Text paste or file upload (.pdf, .docx, .txt, .md).
02
🔍
Verify
Every factual claim is sent to 3 independent sources in parallel: Perplexity Sonar, Google Fact Check, and authoritative domain baselines.
03
📊
Review
Claims highlight green (verified) or amber (disputed). Click any claim to see which sources agreed, which didn't, and the actual snippets.
04
Export
Accept fixes inline or edit manually. Export the corrected article in Markdown or plain text, complete with source citations.
Live Verification
Every claim. Every source. Every verdict visible.

The SEC reported that insider trading enforcement actions increased 42% in fiscal year 2025, with penalties totaling over $4.2 billion across 731 cases. Under Chair Gensler's tenure, the commission filed more enforcement actions than any prior five-year period, focusing particularly on crypto-related violations.

SEC.gov Annual Report FY2025
"...enforcement actions rose 42% year-over-year to 784 total actions..."
Reuters Legal
"...total monetary penalties reached $3.9 billion across 784 cases, not 731..."
Congressional Research Service
"...record enforcement activity exceeded all previous five-year windows..."
Consensus 87%
AI hallucinations are ending up in
courtrooms and headlines.
Don't be next.

Lawyers citing non-existent cases. Financial reports with fabricated statistics. Medical content with invented studies. A single unverified claim published under your name is a liability. Crosscheck catches what single-model review misses — by asking multiple independent sources and showing you exactly where they agree and where they don't.

Finance & Legal Publishing Newsrooms Research Teams Healthcare Content AI-Assisted Editorial
3–5
Sources Per Claim
30–90s
Verification Time
100%
Source Transparency
0
Black Box Verdicts
Pricing
Start free. Scale when you need to.
Feature Free Starter — $49/mo Professional — $149/mo
$0
forever
$149
/month
Verifications / month 3 500
Multi-source consensus
Document upload (.pdf, .docx)
Full verification history
Export (Markdown / plain text)
Trusted source scoring
CSV export for compliance
Start free Subscribe
Why Crosscheck
Built for teams whose reputation depends on getting facts right.
Workflow

Resolve Inline, Export Clean

Disputed claims highlighted amber, verified green. Click any highlight for the source breakdown. One-click "Insert Fix" or manual edit. Export the corrected article in your format.

Transparency

Show the Work

Every verdict comes with a full breakdown: which sources agreed, which disagreed, the actual snippets, and the recommended correction. Defend every approval or flag.

Consensus

Not One More LLM Opinion

Single-model fact-checking trades one hallucination problem for another. Crosscheck derives confidence from inter-source agreement across independent authoritative references.

Enterprise

Built for Regulated Industries

Finance, legal, health, tech. Teams running AI-generated content through verification before publish. Where a single factual error means liability, not just embarrassment.

Verification infrastructure for content teams that can't afford to be wrong.

Every stat, citation, and claim your team publishes, verified against independent sources with full transparency. Compress days of manual fact-checking into minutes without sacrificing rigor.

Start free — no card required View all plans